Archive for November, 2007

  • Page 2 of 2
  • <
  • 1
  • 2


Friday, November 9th, 2007
ZOMG!!!

Lauren Dane sold two books to Berkley Heat, you all!!!! Go on over to her blog and offer her some congratulations! She’s been working long and hard for this one and I know she would appreciate it.

The book she sold is called Battlefront (at least, for now) and it’s way hot. It’s a futuristic menage with a righteous dose of BDSM. I’ve read it and it rocks.

And….how about this for a cherry on the cake?

Our agent, (mine and Lauren’s), just ranked FOUR in Publisher Weekly’s Top Five Dealmakers of 2007!! This is especially impressive because Laura is a newer agent on the scene and just look who she ranks with. Pretty damn cool….

Roberta Brown
Natasha Kern
Dierdre Knight
Laura Bradford
Pam Ahearn

Of course, myself and some others knew she was awesome before anyone else knew she was awesome. ;) This comes as no surprise to us.

Monday, November 5th, 2007
Character Chemistry

Cross-posted to The Bradford Bunch blog

Opposite attract is an old saying and one that definitely bears out in my opinion. My husband and I are just about as opposite as you can get. He’s outgoing, extroverted, lives for the social scene. He’s methodically organized with everything. I’m, well, the opposite of all that. *g* I’m introverted, not scared of a social scene, just not energized by it. And I’m definitely not organized with anything but my novel files. (I can never, ever find my keys! Or my cell phone!) I’m the creative, kinda dreamy one, the right-brainer philosopher type. He’s the feet-on-the-ground, take charge of reality type.

Oddly, though, despite our huge differences in personality, we work really well together and have for many years now. We have qualities the other lack and so, together, we make a whole. Kinda like ying and yang. Probably this situation doesn’t always work, but sometimes it does.

Since it works for my husband and I, I tend to pair my heroes and heroines the same way. It’s what I know. (Write what you know.) To me, the right kind of opposite equates character chemistry. Chemistry makes the romance. ***

In Witch Fire, Jack McAllister is unpredictable and impetuous (a little like the element he commands). He needed a woman to balance him out, so I gave him Mira, a woman who is coming out a bad relationship and is (trying) to proceed cautiously and make solid decisions.

In Witch Blood, Thomas Monahan is a little bit uptight. He’s a micro-manager and a control-freak. He’s got a lot riding on his shoulders and never really allows himself to cut loose at all. He’s sort of Jack’s opposite (and they clash once in a while because of it). Thomas clearly needed a free spirit and that’s what I gave him. That’s all I want to say about that, since the book hasn’t come out yet. ;)

And now I’m writing Witch Heart (that title might change). The hero is introduced in Witch Blood. He’s a real commitment-phobe and has lots of relationships with women, but always makes sure they don’t go farther than the bedroom. He jokes around a lot and everyone thinks he’s a carefree and restless. That’s his rep. There’s more when you scratch this guy’s surface, though. Stuff that’s hinted at in Witch Blood, but will only come fully into the light in Witch Heart.

His heroine is waaay different from any heroine I’ve really ever written before. Her experiences have been such that she’s far, far different from any woman this guy has ever met (she’s a challenge to write too). I think she’s exactly what he needs. Talk about opposites attracting. And, again, that’s all I want to say about this book.

Oh, here’s a tangent. One of my pet peeves about romance novels is the scene in which everyone is fearing for their lives, yet the hero and heroine are busy lusting after each other. You, know, like, the serial killer is rounding the corner, advancing on the hero and heroine, knife in hand, yet the heroine can’t stop thinking about the hero’s massive biceps?

What are some of your romance pet peeves? I want to blog about them next week, so weigh in! Or tell me about your experiences with “opposites attracting”. I want to hear it all.

***Disclaimer here: It’s my intention to create character chemistry. The end result, like everything else, is in the eye of the reader.

Friday, November 2nd, 2007
A fourteen year old boy owns part of my soul…..

Yeah, I loved Transformers. Shoot me. *g*

Devon Matthews (Hi Devon!! *waving*) asked yesterday, “What’s the difference between an urban fantasy romance and a paranormal romance?”

Er. I probably made up the term urban fantasy romance all on my own. Ooops. :) But (to me, anyway) the difference is setting. My Elemental Witch books are taking place in Chicago and Minneapolis, but in an alternate reality in which witches and demons exist. What I write is paranomal romance, definitely. I would also call it (and it has been called) urban fantasy because of the urban setting/alternate reality angle. Hence, urban fantasy romance.

But, gosh, there are so many labels, categories and sub-categories!  The romance genre is changing, growing and mutating all the time. I just love it!

Thursday, November 1st, 2007
Erotic romance, romance – definitions

I wrote a response to a question posed about the definition of erotic romance to a discussion loop recently. This is that response, but kind of expanded (new and improved and now with tangents!). This question comes up frequently on loops and blogs, ect.

Mostly, I think the definition of erotic romance is developing and changing as erotic romance becomes more a mainstream feature of the romance genre. I also think that everyone has their own definitions of these terms. Going by the dictionary, after all, is a little limited.  Everyone brings a different perspective to the books they read based on their worldview and life experiences. One person’s erotic romance is another person’s porn.

My books have been called porn. I don’t have a problem with the word porn, really, even though the people wielding the word usually mean it in a negative way. As in, “This book has no plot; it’s just meaningless porn”. (Obviously, I tend to not agree. Heh. However, I understand the POV/worldview element and respect the person’s right to her perception.) Here’s how I define the term: Porn to me is visual, not written. Porn is explicit images in magazines and on video.

Erotica is any written story where the sex is the primary focus. There might be a plot beyond the sexual story, but the focus is on sex. Typically, I don’t think of these stories as romances, though the plot might explore larger issues or show the emotional development of the characters (literary erotica). It also might just be the “penthouse letters” form of erotica and meant simply to titillate.

Erotic romance is a romance, where the development of the relationship between the hero and heroine is focused on, but is also very sexually explicit. Erotic romance interweaves the sexual and emotional journey of the H/H. If you cut away all the sexual bits, the story still stands on its own. However, sex plays a large role in the plot.

A non-erotic romance usually only focuses on the emotional development of the relationship, less so on the sexual (although, of course, that’s always a part of it to some degree).

I don’t really see any problem making an erotic romance a very emotional and heart tugging journey, while also having it be explicit. So, to me, an erotic romance is simply a romance novel with door flung wide open on the lovemaking scenes. :)

Now, I write everything from what I would term paranormal romance to erotic romance to flat out erotica. Mostly what I write is paranormal erotic romance or urban fantasy erotic romance. I think trying to slap a label on this particular sub-genre gets a little complex.

My books vary in their degree of heat because of the characters. Sometimes I write characters who are totally all right with super-kink and engage in it freely. Sometimes not. Ultimately, they are the chief drivers of how hot a novel is. So some of my books have a high degree of sexuality, sometimes less so. I would say that as a general rule, readers who don’t enjoy explicit sex scenes should probably stay away from my work.

What are your definitions?



  • Page 2 of 2
  • <
  • 1
  • 2